*Part 2 of this post. Well worth reading; there is a lot of very valuable information in here, and it is largely written in a way that is understandable in principle if not in vast **detail for the non-scientists. Stephanie*

Di Biase, Quantum-holographic informational consciousness

ISSN 1303 5150 http://www.neuroquantology.com

657

OPINION AND PERSPECTIVES

Quantum-Holographic Informational

Consciousness

Francisco Di Biase

Abstract

The author propose a quantum-informational holographic model of brainconsciousness-

universe interactions based in the holonomic neural networks of

Karl Pribram, in the holographic quantum theory developed by David Bohm, and

in the non-locality property of the quantum field described by Hiroomi Umezawa.

I consider this model an extension of the interactive dualism of Sir John Eccles, of

an interconnection between brain and spirit by means of quantum microsites

named dendrons and psychons. I propose a dynamic concept of consciousness

seen as a holoinformational flux interconnecting the holonomic informational

quantum brain dynamics, with the quantum informational holographic nature of

the universe. This self-organizing flux is generated by the holographic mode of

treatment of neuronal information and can be optimized through practices of

deep meditation, prayer, and others states of higher consciousness that underlie

the coherence of cerebral waves. In brain mapping studies performed during the

occurrence of these harmonic states we can see the spectral array of brain waves

highly synchronized and perfectly ordered like a unique harmonic wave, as if all

frequencies of all neurons from all cerebral centers played the same symphony.

This highly coherent brain state generates the non-local holographic

informational cortical field of consciousness that interconnect the human brain

and the holographic cosmos. The comprehension of this holonomic quantum

informational nature of brain-consciousness-universe interconnectedness allows

us to solve the old mind-matter cartesian hard problem, unifying science,

philosophy, and spiritual traditions in a more transdisciplinary, holistic, integrated

paradigm. In this new arrangement cosmovision, consciousness and

transpersonal phenomena becomes part of Science and of the very

holoinformational nature of the Holographic Conscious Multiverse.

Key Words: consciousness, quantum holography, quantum Information, mindbody

problem.

Corresponding author: Francisco Di Biase

Address: Albert Schweitzer University, Switzerland; World

Information Distributed, University, Belgium and Clínica Di Biase,

Barra do Piraí, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

e-mail: dibiase@terra.com.br

Introduction

Here I present a quantum-informational

holographic model of brain-conscious-universe

interaction based on the holonomic neural

network model of Karl Pribram (Pribram, 1977a;

b) and relying on the ontological interpretation

of quantum theory developed by David Bohm

(Bohm, 1983; 1987; Bohm and Peat, 1987), with

extended nonlocal properties of the quantum

field as described by Hiroomi Umezawa (1993). I

consider this model an extension of the

interactive dualism developed by Sir John Eccles

(Eccles, 1952; 1989; 1993; 1994; 1998) and

extended by Richard Amororso (Amoroso, 1999;

2000; 2003; Amoroso et al., 2000). Eccles’ idea

of an interconnection between brain and spirit

NeuroQuantology | December 2009 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 | Page 657-664

Di Biase, Quantum-holographic informational consciousness

ISSN 1303 5150 http://www.neuroquantology.com

658

by means of quantum microsites named

dendrons (bundles of nerve dendrites) that

couple to psychons, (Eccles philosophical

construct of mind that interacted with or

coupled to brain dendrons.)has deeply

influenced the development of my conception of

consciousness (Di Biase, 1981; 1995; Di Biase

and Rocha, 1998; 2000). I propose a dynamic

concept of consciousness seen as a

holoinformational flux interconnecting

holonomic informational Quantum Brain

Dynamics (QBD) (di Biase and Rocha, 2000;

2004; Di Biase and Amoroso, 2005), with the

quantum informational holographic nature of

the universe (Di Biase and Amoroso, 2008). This

self-organizing flux is generated by a holographic

mode of neuronal information that can be

optimized through practices of deep meditation,

prayer, and other states of higher consciousness.

The quantum potential in Bohm’s ontological

interpretation of quantum theory is a guidance

principle (called the pilot wave by de Broglie)

and was introduced to ‘steer’ evolution of the

wave function. of which may effect the

coherence of cerebral waves (Di Biase, 1995; Di

Biase and Rocha, 1998; 2000; 2004).

Brain mapping studies performed during

the occurrence of these harmonic states have

shown a highly synchronized and perfectly

ordered spectral array of brain waves that form

unique harmonic waves, as if all frequencies of

all neurons from all cerebral centers played the

same symphony. This highly coherent brain state

generates the nonlocal holographic

informational cortical field of consciousness

interconnecting the human brain and the

holographic cosmos (Bohm and Hiley, 1993). The

comprehension of this holonomic quantum

informational nature of brain-consciousnessuniverse

interconnectedness allows us to solve

the historic mind-matter Cartesian hard problem

(Chalmers, 1995a; 1995 b; 1996 ), unifying

science, philosophy, and spiritual traditions in an

expanded transdisciplinary, holistic, paradigm. In

this new cosmovision, consciousness and

transpersonal phenomena becomes parts of

science and of the very holoinformational nature

of the universe (Amoroso et al., 2000).

In this holoinformational cosmovision

brain and universe are conceived as quantum

holographic informational systems

interconnected by an instantaneous universal

nonlocal holoinformational flux. This

instantaneous holoinformational brain-cosmos

dynamics is based on three pillars of modern

science:

1) The holographic neural network

processing of brain systems described by

neuroscientist Karl Pribram (Pribram,

1969; 1980; 1991; 1993; 1997; 1997b).

2) The quantum-holographic theory of

the universe developed by physicist

David Bohm (Bohm, 1987; Bohm and

Peat, 1987; Bohm and Hiley, 1993).

3) The quantum principle of nonlocality

developed by physicist Hiroomi

Umezawa, in his theory of the quantum

field (Zurek, 1990).

For a more comprehensive exposition of

my text I am going initially to define the terms

nonlocality and holographic.

Nonlocality

Nonlocality is a fundamental property of the

universe, proved to exist at the quantum and

macroscopic level, responsible for instantaneous

interactions between all cosmic phenomena – a

mathematical consequence of Umezawa’s

Quantum Field Theory (Umezawa,, 1993) that

unifies the electromagnetic, nuclear and

gravitational fields in a subjacent indivisible

totality.

Quantum Field Theory explains all

subatomic, atomic, microscopic and even

macroscopic phenomena, as well as

superconductivity and lasers; and is considered

the most fundamental physical theory of the

universe. Besides being mathematically similar

to the gravitational and electromagnetic fields,

the quantum field doesn’t exist physically in 3D

spacetime giving rise to it’s peculiar nonlocal

property. As a nonlocal phenomenon it

influences instantaneously all others regions of

spacetime, without necessity of any change of

energy.

According to classical and relativistic

physics nonlocal phenomena do not exist. This

theoretical impossibility generated the famous

Einstein-Bohr controversy and the celebrated

Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) Paradox. Einstein

and his associates wouldn’t admit that quanta or

information could travel faster than light and

created a thought experiment to demonstrate

that quantum physics was therefore incomplete.

But contrary to their initial proposition, the

existence of nonlocality has been dramatically

and convincingly proven to exist in modern

physics experiments. According to Bohr, if an

atom simultaneously emits two opposite spin

particles, and if we alter the spin of one, even if

they are separated by an enormous distance (for

instance, one in a lab on Earth and the second

on the other side of the galaxy), the spin of the

second is instantaneously modified..

Holographic Systems

Holographic systems are systems that can

generate three-dimensional virtual images. The

virtual image or hologram is created when a

laser falls upon an object and reflects on a plate

and a second laser or rectilinear reflected beam

falls on this plate generating a mix of the waves

from the two beams. This wave interference

pattern stores all the information about the

form and volume of the object, and when it is

reflected it generates a three-dimensional image

of the object in space. The relevancy for us is

that we can prove mathematically and

experimentally that in holographic systems

information about the whole system is

distributed in each part of the system. If we

break the holographic plate, each part of it will

display the entire three-dimensional image of

the object in space, showing us that in

holographic systems the whole is in the parts as

each part is in the whole.

These holographic transformations form

spacetime order from a spectral dimension of

frequencies the description of which is

dependent on the pioneering mathematical

formulations first described by a concept called

monads developed by Leibniz. In the Twentieth

Century Dennis Gabor described the

mathematical principles of holography, winning

him a Nobel Prize. The mathematical

formulations that describe the harmonic curve

resulting from the interference pattern of waves

are called Fourier transformations, after the

18th century French mathematician that

described it. Gabor applied Fourier

transformations to the creation of the hologram

showing how Fourier transforms of the

interference pattern can be used to rebuild the

virtual image of the object by the application of

the inverse process. Gabor showed that from a

dimension of frequencies objects in spacetime

can be rebuilt in a virtual form!

Holographic Neural Networks Fields

Karl Pribram has demonstrated with his

holonomic theory of brain dynamics that the

cerebral cortex is the site of a holographic

information process he calls a multiplex neural

hologram that is dependent on local circuits of

neurons without long fibers that do not transmit

ordinary nervous impulses. “These neurons

function in the undulatory mode and are above

all responsible by the horizontal layer

connections of the neural tissue where

holographic interference patterns can be built”

(Pribram, 1993). Pribram presents evidences

that at the level of conscious experience,

information processing in the brain is basically

Gabor-like rather than binary (as in Shannon’s

information measurement theory). He shows

that the process takes place in a phase space

created by a multiply interconnected web of

teledendrons, synapses and dendrites, called

synaptodendritic web.

The neural hologram is build by the

interaction of the electromagnetic fields of the

neurons similarly to the interaction of sound

waves in a piano. When a piano is played the

keys strike the strings generating a vibrational

standing wave between the two ends of the

string, creating an interference pattern (This

interference can be destructive or constructive).

Nodes of constructive interference, of these

sound frequencies, create the harmony or

harmonics that are the notes making up the

music we listen to. Pribram has demonstrated

that a similar process is continuously occurring in

the cerebral cortex by means of the

interpenetration of the electromagnetic fields of

the adjacent cortical neurons, generating a

harmonic field. According to Pribram’s model his

harmonic electromagnetic field distributed in

the cerebral cortex, holographically stores and

encodes a huge information field responsible for

the emergence of memory and consciousness.

As the music is not in the piano but in the

resonating field that surrounds it, so our

memories and consciousness are not in the

brain, but in the holographic information field

that surrounds it.

Pribram’s neural wave equation

(Pribram, 1993), describing holographic neural

network processing is similar to the Schrödinger

wave equation of quantum theory with the

addition of the de Broglie-Bohm Quantum

Potential. This is not coincidental and opens the

possibility of holographic interaction between

receptive fields in the cortex with the

holographic quantum universe described by

David Bohm. This new holographic paradigm

allows us to rethink the manner in which

information processing occurs in the nervous

system. In this context, Pribram’s quantum

holonomic theory of brain function is one of the

most brilliant and revolutionary contribution to

neuroscience in the 100 years since the initial

studies of Sherrington!

Information

The notion of information implies a certain

ambigüity, meaning the bit capacity of a physical

system (Shannon), or the semantic content

(meaning) conducted by the bits during a

communication. In the information theory, the

organization, the order expressed by the amount

of information in the system (Shannon’s H

function) is the information measure that is

missing to us, the uncertainty about the system.

The classical theory of information

situated at the level of “bit capacity”, is unable

to provide the proper connection to non-local

information and consciousness (Clarke, 1995). So

we need a more radical view of information for

a more radical view of the fundamental nature

of consciousness.

Non-local quantum information

According to Bohm, De Broglie’s model is a new

type of field, which activity is dependent upon

the information content that is conducted to the

whole experimental field. Adding to its

equations a Quantum Potential that satisfies

Schrödinger’s equation, that depends on the

form but not on the amplitude of the wave

function, Bohm developed a model in which this

quantum potential, carries “active information”

that “guides” the particle along its way. This

quantum potential is subtle in its form and does

not decay with the distance.

Information Physics

Developed by Wojciech Zurek (1990) and others,

propose that the physical entropy would be a

combination of two magnitudes that

compensate each other:

1-the observer’s ignorance, measured by

Shannon’s statistical entropy

2-the disorder degree of the observed system,

measured by the algorythmic entropy which is

the smallest number of bits needed to register it

in the memory.

During the measurement, the observer’s

ignorance is reduced, as a result of the increase

in bit numbers in its memory, remaining,

however,constant the sum of these two

magnitudes, that is, the physical entropy.

Quantum Informational View of the Universe

In this informational view of the universe the

observer remains included as part of the system,

and the quantum universe changes because the

observer’s mind unleashed a transfer of

information at a subatomic level.

From this all results a Law of

Conservation of Information as well as or more

fundamental than the law of conservation of

energy. So, as put by Stonier (1993):

Information is the cosmical organizational

principle with a “status” equal to matter and

energy.

In another paper (Di Biase and Rocha,

2000), I defined information as “a intrinsic,

irreducible and non-local, property of the

universe, capable of generate order, selforganization

and complexity” . Chalmers (1995a;

1995b; 1996), defines consciousness as “an

irreducible aspect of the universe, like space and

time and mass”. So we conclude that

consciousness is non-local information with a

status equal to matter and energy

3. The Holographic Multiverse

The mathematical formulations that describe the

harmonic slope resulting from wave interference

are Fourier transformations that Dennis Gabor

applied to the development of the hologram,

enriching it by the application of the inverse

process, a model in which the interference

pattern rebuilds the object in a virtual image. In

NeuroQuantology | December 2009 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 | Page 657-664

Di Biase, Quantum-holographic informational consciousness

ISSN 1303 5150 http://www.neuroquantology.com

661

other words, from the spectral dimension of

frequency one can reconstruct mathematically

and experimentally the object in spacetime

dimensions!

This holographic organization mode is

also what Bohm applied to quantum theory to

develop his holographic quantum theory of the

universe. In Bohm’s universe model, space and

time are mixed, “folded” into a dimension of

frequencies that is an implicit hidden order

without spacetime relations. In this field of

frequencies dimensional fluctuations occur,

more intense “undulations” like holographic

patterns, to build a spacetime dimension (Peat,

1987). This explicit order is our manifest

universe. According to Bohm (1983):

“In the implicate order everything is folded

into everything. But it’s important to note

here that the whole universe, is in principle

enfolded into each part actively through the

holomovement, as well as the parts. Now

this means that the dynamic activity-internal

and external- which is fundamental for what

each part is, is based on its enfoldment of all

the rest, including the whole universe. But of

course, each part may unfold others in

different degrees and ways. That is, they are

not all enfolded equally in each part. But the

basic principle of enfoldment in the whole, is

not thereby denied. Therefore enfoldment is

not merely superficial or passive but, I

emphasize again, that each part is in a

fundamental sense internally related in its

basic activities to the whole and to all the

other parts. The mechanistic idea of external

relation as fundamental, is therefore denied.

Of course such relationships are still

considered to be real, but of secondary

significance. That is, we can get

approximations to a mechanistic behavior

out of this. That is to say, the order of the

world, as a structure of things that is

basically external to each other, comes as

secondary and emerges from the deeper

implicate order”.

4. Towards a Holoinformational Theory of

Consciousness

Experimental research developed by Pribram

and other consciousness researchers like

Hameroff (1994; 2007) and Penrose (Hameroff

and Penrose, 1996; 2003), Jibu and Yassue

(1995), confirm the existence of a Quantum

Brain Dynamics in neural microtubules, in

synapses and in the molecular organization of

the cerebrospinal fluid. This Quantum Brain

Dynamics can generate Bose-Einstein

condensates and the Fröhlich Effect. Bose-

Einstein condensates consist of atomic particles,

or in the case of the Fröhlich Effect biological

molecules, that can assume a high level of

coherent alignment, functioning as a highly

ordered and unified informational state, as seen

in lasers and superconductivity. These quantum

dynamics show us that the interaction process

between dendrons and psychons, described by

Eccles, are not limited to the synaptic cleft, as

stated by Eccles, but a much wider embodiment

throughout the whole brain. Psychons are

presumed to operate on synapses by way of

quantum processes.

Pribram (1991) demonstrates good

evidence that Eccles’ dendrons make up

receptive fields in cortical sensory units.

Dendrons are composed of pre-synaptic

teledendrons, synapses and post-synaptic

dendrites. They compose the fine fiber structure

wherein brain processing occurs. As Pribram

states (1991), “as sensory generated receptive

fields they can be mapped in terms of wavelets,

or wavelet-like patterns such as Gabor

Elementary Functions. Dennis Gabor (1946)

called these units Quanta of Information. The

reason for this name is that Gabor used the same

mathematics to describe his units as had

Heisenberg in describing the units of quantum

microphysics. Here they define the unit structure

of processes occurring in the material brain”.

Like Pribram , I see this quantum

holographic interactions not as a contradiction

but as a natural extension of Eccles ideas (Eccles,

1952; 1989; 1993; 1994; 1998; Popper and

Eccles, 1977).

I expanded my conjecture that the

interconnectedness between brain and cosmos

is an instantaneous nonlocal connection and to

the concept of a holoinformational flux, from

which both mind and matter are in-formed, that

resembles Bohm’s holomovement. But in this

new concept, quantum holographic brain

dynamic patterns are conceived as an active part

of the universal quantum-holographic

informational field, and capable of generating an

informational field interconnection that is

simultaneously nonlocal (quantum-holistic) and

local (Newtonian-mechanistic), i.e.,

holoinformational. Taking yet in consideration

the basic mathematical property of holographic

systems in which the information of the whole

system is distributed in each part of the system,

plus Bohm’s holographic quantum physics data,

and the experimental data of the holonomic

theory of Pribram, we propose that this

universal interconnectedness (Laszlo, 2003)

could permit us to access all the information (Di

Biase and Rocha, 2000; 2004; Di Biase and

Amoroso, 2005; 2008) codified in the wave

interference patterns existing in all the universe

since its origin. The quantum-holoinformational

nature of the universe interconnects each part,

each brain-consciousness, with all the

information stored in the holographic patterns

distributed in the whole cosmos, in an indivisible

irreducible informational cosmic unity (Bohm

and Hiley, 1993; Di Biase and Amoroso, 2008;

Zurek, 1990).

As a consciousness exercise, analogous

to Einstein’s thought experiments, we could

compare this universal informational

interconnectedness with the following

metaphoric quotations from various spiritual

traditions: As above so below (Alchemy). All that

is outside is inside (Upanishads). The father is

inside us (Christianity). As in the earth so in the

heavens (Christianity). This universal

interconnectedness could be perfectly

understood as a Cosmic Holographic

Consciousness.

Consciousness in this conception is the

holoinformational flux that permits the

interaction of the Holonomic Informational

Quantum Brain Dynamics – that we can consider

as extended dendrons – with the quantumholographic

nature of the universe, that we can

view as an extended cosmic psychon.

As I have already put Pribram states, that as

sensory receptive fields dendrons can be

mapped in terms of Gabor’s Elementary

Functions or wavelet-like patterns, and Gabor

called these unities Quanta of Information,

because he used the same mathematics to

describe it as Heisenberg did in describing units

of quantum physics. Yet Pribram shows:

They define the unit structure of processes

occurring in the material brain. However,

Gabor invented his function, not to describe

brain processes, but to find the maximum

compressibility of a telephone message that

could be sent over the Atlantic Cable without

destroying its intelligibility. The Gabor

function thus describes both a unit of brain

processing and a unit of communication.

Brain is material, communication is mental.

The same mathematical formulation

describes both. The elementary structure of

processing in Eccles material dendron is

identical to the elementary structure of

processing of a mental (communication)

psychon. There is a structural identity to the

dual interactive process (Amoroso, 2003).

Richard Amoroso, creator of Noetic Field

Theory (Amoroso, 1999; 2000; Amoroso et al.,

2000), tell us that “Consciousness pervades

atoms, is the organizing power deeper than

gravitation (unitary field), that frames the

universe, causes gravitation, and the flux or élan

vital which gives life and is the ‘light of the

mind’… this basic holistic framework

incorporates the implicate and explicate order

described by Bohm” (Eccles, 1989; 1994). This

noetic definition of consciousness is as radical as

our holoinformational consciousness, and I think

we are saying the same thing with different

approaches.

5. Transpersonal States of Consciousness as

highly synchronized harmonic brain state

Through practices of deep meditation, prayer,

and others states of higher consciousness that

elevates the coherence of cerebral waves, this

universal interconnectedness becomes

expanded by synchronizing the functioning of

the cerebral hemispheres and unleashing a

highly coherent brain state that optimizes the

holographic treatment of neuronal information.

In brain mapping studies this highly

synchronized harmonic state shows brain waves

highly synchronized and perfectly ordered, in a

unique harmonic wave, as if all frequencies of all

neurons from all cerebral centers played the

same symphony. In my concept this highly

harmonic synchronized state generates a

nonlocal holographic informational cortical field

creating a holoinformational flux of

consciousness interconnecting the human mind

with the Holographic Cosmic Consciousness. A

survey of these electroencephalographic and

clinical studies can be found in my Portuguese

books (Di Biase, 1995; Di Biase and Rocha, 1998;

2004), and the mathematics of it can be view in

a recent paper I published with Richard

Amoroso, we presented in Belgium (Di Biase and

Amoroso, 2008).

References

Amoroso RL et.al., (ed) Pribram K, Grof S, Sheldrake R,

Goswami A, Di Biase F. Science and the Primacy of

Consciousness, Orinda: Noetic Press. 2000.

Amoroso RL. An introduction to noetic field theory: The

quantization of mind, The Noetic Journal 1999;

2(1):28-37.

Amoroso RL. Consciousness, a radical definition: Substance

dualism solves the hard problem, In Amoroso, (ed.),

Pribram,K.H., Grof, S., Sheldrake, R., Goswami, A., Di

Biase, F., Science and the Primacy of Consciousness,

Orinda: Noetic Press. 2000.

Amoroso RL. The Fundamental Limit and Origin of Biological

Systems. Noetic Journal 4:1; 24-32.

Amoroso RL. The physical basis of qualia: Overcoming the

1st person 3rd person barrier. Noetic Journal 2003;

4(3): 212-230.

Aspect A, Dalibard J, and Roger G. Experimental Test of

Bell’s Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers. Phys

Rev Lett 1982; 49: 1804–1807.

Bohm D and Hiley BJ. The Undivided Universe, London:

Routledge. 1993.

Bohm D and Peat FD. Science Order, and Creativity, New

York, Bantam. 1987.

Bohm D. Unfolding Meaning, a weekend of dialogue with

David Bohm. ARK, Paperbacks, Routledge & Kegan Paul

Ltd. 1987.

Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge,

New York, 1983.

Chalmers DJ. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J

Consciousness Studies 1995; 2 (3): 200-19.

Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a

Fundamental Theory. New York, Oxford Univ. Press.

1996.

Chalmers DJ. The puzzle of conscious experience. Scientific

American, December 1995.

Clarke CJS. The Nonlocality of Mind. J Consciousness

Studies 1995; 2(3): 231-240.

Di Biase F and Amoroso RL (eds.) A Revolução da

Consciência. Novas Descobertas sobre a Mente no

Século XXI. Editora Vozes, Rio, Brasil. 2005.

Di Biase F and Rocha MS. Caminhos da Cura, Petrópolis, Rio

de Janeiro: Editora Vozes. 1998.

Di Biase F and Rocha MS. Information Self- Organization

and Consciousness: Toward a Holoinformational

Theory of Consciousness, In Amoroso RL et al, (eds.)

Science and the Primacy of Consciousness:Intimation

of a 21st Century Revolution, Oakland: Noetic Press,

2000.

Di Biase F andRocha MS. Ciência Espiritualidade e Cura-

PsicologiaTranspessoal e Ciências Holísticas, Rio :

Editora Qualitymark. 2004.

Di Biase F, Amoroso RL. Holoinformational Consciousness:

An Extension of Interactive Dualism with Antecipatory

Parameters. International Journal of Computing

Anticipatory Systems, Vol. 22, 2008, Edited by D.M.

Dubois, CHAOS, Liège, Belgium. 2008.

Di Biase F. Auto-organização nos sistemas biológicos,

Ciência e Cult., Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso

da Ciência 1981; 339: 1155-1159.

Di Biase F. O Homem Holístico, a Unidade Mente-Natureza,

Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes. 1995.

Eccles JC. A unitary hypothesis of mind-brain interaction in

the cerebral cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 1989; 240: 433-

451.

Eccles JC. Do mental events cause neural events

analogously to the probability fields of quantum

mechanics? Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 1998; 227:411-28.

Eccles JC. Evolution du Cerveau et Création de la

Conscience, ch. 8.8. Une nouvelle hypothèse sur

l’interaction esprit/cerveau à partir de la physique

quantique: l’hypothèse des micro-sites, Flammarion,

Paris. 1994.

Eccles JC. Evolution of Complexity of the Brain with the

Emergence of Consciousness, In Pribram, K. (ed.)

Rethinking Neural Networks: Quantum Fields and

Biological Data, Manwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1993.

Eccles JC. The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind. Oxford

University Press, Oxford. 1952.

Hameroff S. Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum

Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for

Consciousness. NeuroQuantology 2007; 5(1): 1-8.

Hameroff S and Penrose R. Conscious Events as

Orchestrated Space-Time Selections.

NeuroQuantology 2003; 1 (1): 10-35.

Hameroff SR and Penrose R. Orchestrated Reduction of

Quantum Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model

For Consciousness, In Toward a Science of

Consciousness: The 1st Tucson Discussions and

Debates, S.R. Hameroff, A.W. Kaszniak, & A.C. Scott,

(eds.), Cambridge: MIT Univ. Press. 1996.

Hameroff SR. Quantum Coherence In Microtubules: A

Neural Basis For Emergent Consciousness? J of

Consciousness Studies 1994; 1:1.

Jibu M and Yasue K. Quantum Brain Dynamics and

Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1995.

Jibu M, Yasue K. The Basics of Quantum Brain Dynamics, in

Pribram, K. (ed.) Rethinking Neural Networks:

Quantum Fields & Biological Data, Manwah: Lawrence

Erlbaum. 1993.

Laszlo E. The Connectivity Hypothesis, N.Y: State Univ. New

York, 2003.

Peat D. Synchronicity, the bridge between matter and

mind, New York:Bantam. 1987.

Popper KR and Eccles JC. The Self and Its Brain, Berlin:

Springer- Verlag. 1977.

NeuroQuantology | December 2009 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 | Page 657-664

Di Biase, Quantum-holographic informational consciousness

ISSN 1303 5150 http://www.neuroquantology.com

664

Pribram K) The Neurophysiology of Remembering. Scientific

American, January 1969; 220.

Pribram K. (Ed). Rethinking Neural Networks: Quantum

Fields and Biological Data, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates. 1993.

Pribram K. Esprit cerveau et conscience, in Science et

Conscience, les deux lectures de l’univers. Editions

Stock , Paris. 1980.

Pribram K. In Memoriam: Nobel Laureate Sir John Eccles.

The Noetic Journal 1997; 1: 2-5.

Pribram K. Languages of the Brain, Monterey, Calif.,

Wadsworth Publishing. 1977.

Pribram K. What is Mind that the Brain May Order It? The

Noetic Journal 1997; 1:72.

Pribram KH. Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure

in Figural Processing, Hilsdale: Erlbaum. 1991.

Umezawa H. Advanced Field Theory, New York: AIP Press.

1993.

Varela FG, Maturana HR and Uribe R. Autopoiesis: The

organization of living systems, its characterization and

a model. BioSystems 1974;5:187-196.

Wheeler J. Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for

Links, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of

Information, Wojciech H. & Zurek (eds) Reading:

Addison-Wesley. 1990.

Zurek WH (ed). Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of

Information. Santa Fé Institute Studies in the Science

of Complexity, Vol.8, Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

Source: http://ervinlaszlo.com/notebook/2010/04/09/cosmic-symphony-a-deeper-look-at-quantum-consciousness-2/

“Mind is not only the result of the interaction of the organism with the environment, from the uterus until death, but also the reflection of the basic organization of the universe: holokinesis, which from the implicit order of the universe becomes explicit as matter, mind and cosmic energies.”

Dr. Rubén Feldman González.

Iniciador de la Psicología Holokinética.

Candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize 2007 through 2011

http://www.percepcionunitaria.org/en